Oversimplified view of gender balance

For the Research Council as a whole, women and men have a roughly equal chance to succeed and obtain financing. In 2015, applications for research projects with women as project leaders had a marginally higher success rate (21.9%) than applications with men as project leaders (21.4%). For all categories of applications, those with male project leaders had a success rate of 37%, marginally higher than applications with female project leaders (36%).

To support her point, Prof Rettberg makes use of the grant rate for women in the last two calls for the Cultural Conditions Underlying Social Change programme (Samfunnsutviklingens kulturelle forutsetninger – SAMKUL). Relevance is an important award criteria in programmes such as SAMKUL. It’s not enough to provide high scientific quality, the research project must also illuminate relevant issues and meet the criteria described in SAMKUL’s Work Programme.

It’s not enough to provide high scientific quality, the research project must also illuminate relevant issues desrcibed in the working programme. (Photo: Shutterstock)

If emphasis on relevance has led to a gender imbalance in SAMKUL over the last two years, the question must be asked whether it really means that more women than men have not met the criteria, or whether the numbers reveal hidden discrimination. We believe this is not about discrimination. Moderate gender quotas, understood as a preference for projects led by women when quality and relevance are equal with projects led by men, have been discussed in all meetings in the SAMKUL programme during the process of considering which projects should receive funding. The numbers from other calls in the programme show another picture, with women receiving approximately 50%. Moreover, this sample is a relatively small. Eleven projects have received funding from SAMKUL in 2016. Consequently, the gender of one project leader can make a large impact on the statistics.

Prof Rettberg points out that Peer reviewers' and Programme Boards' decisions can be affected by implicit bias, and thus give women poorer assessments and a lower chance than they deserve. We totally agree that this is a real risk. Therefore, we plan to intensify the work we already do to make panels and programme Boards more aware of implicit bias.

The Research Council believes it is essential to promote gender balance. It is not desirable that we have three times as many male professors than women professors and twice as many male research project managers than women project managers.. It is important that institutions encourage and support female scientists. To move forward this process, the Research Council practices a system of moderate gender quotas . Quality is assessed by external experts on a scale of 1 to 7, so there is no doubt that some projects may receive an equal score, while the relevance is considered by the Programme Boards.. An important part of the discussion concerning similar, highly rated applications may take up the question of gender quotas and women may be favoured . This discussion should be a part of the award process as well as when evaluating whether the objective of gender balance has been achieved.

In her posts, Jill Walker Rettberg calls for more transparency concerning the numbers that show how gender balance and gender differences affect the likelihood for receiving funding. The Research Council has long published the figures concerning gender balance, and we have worked continuously to improve our analytics and increase transparency of all our endeavours. Prof Rettberg has made many good points, which we will take with us in our future efforts.


Related news

Latest news

Consilium Receives First Order for Web-based Remote Playback Service

Consilium has launched a new web-based service for ship-to-shore transfer and playback of ship voyage data. The first order for this new Remote Playback service comes from Stena Line Scandinavia AB, following a period...


Interested in a complete overview of the Norwegian seafood industry, including products, origin, buying, selling, peparation, tips and tricks? Try the new content resource fromnorway.com, powered by the Norwegian Seafood C...

CMR about allocation uncertainty at North Sea Flow Measurement

In times with increased focus on risk minimization and cost-efficiency in the oil and gas sector, it is more important than ever to understand the uncertainty involved in the distribution of produced oil and gas amongst co...

Great interest in smart options

An increasing number of people become aware of how smart options can make the construction process more efficient and life for residents easier, says product manager NorDan Smart, Olav Hjørungnes.

Salmon Wellboat Sails Electric

The new MS SEIHAV has now gone on chart with the Norwegian salmon farming company Lerøy Seafood Group. A reliable and environmentally sustainable propulsion arrangement has been chosen for MS SEIHAV.

Servogear at Interferry 2016

It is almost time for the 41th annual Interferry Conference. From October 15-19, Servogear will be present in Manila.

Strainstall mooring monitoring for Hywind

Strainstall provides specialised mooring monitoring for pioneering floating offshore wind farm project, Hywind. Collaboration with MacGregor delivers fully integrated mooring solution to monitor the forces on the floating ...

NSM Signs contract with Embraer

Norwegian Special Mission signed a contract with Embraer to supply six (6) UNIFIS 3000 Navaids Flight Inspection Systems to be integrated into six Embraer Legacy 500 aircraft.

Designing the energy solutions for autonomous airships

The Stratobus project is a new concept for an autonomous airship, operating at an altitude of about 20 kilometers. It is led by Thales Alenia Space (TAS). CMR Prototech has been chosen by Thales Alenia Space to s...